Pricing, features, texting, online booking, and which grooming software actually fit salons

DaySmart Pet has been around longer than most of its competitors — it started as 123Pet in the early 2000s and rebranded in the 2020s. Teddy is the opposite: a newer, leaner platform built specifically for the way independent groomers work today. If you're weighing Teddy vs DaySmart, you're really weighing legacy depth against modern simplicity. This comparison breaks down where each platform genuinely wins, where they fall short, and which one fits which kind of grooming business in 2026.
DaySmart Pet is the right choice if you run a multi-location chain, you've been on DaySmart for years and your team knows it, or you need deep enterprise-grade reporting and payroll integration.
Teddy is the right choice if you're an independent groomer or small salon (1-5 people), you text clients constantly and don't want per-message overages, you want a modern interface that doesn't take a week to learn, and you'd benefit from an AI receptionist catching missed calls.
Both platforms work. The choice comes down to where you are in your business and what you actually use day-to-day.
Both platforms publish tiered pricing, and both have changed prices in the last 18 months. Always check the official sites before committing.
DaySmart Pet runs roughly $29-$99/month for the base platform depending on tier, with add-ons for payment processing, marketing, and additional users. Texting credits are typically bundled in limited amounts, with overages charged per message.
Teddy uses a flat platform fee that includes unlimited two-way SMS on the standard plan. The AI receptionist is a separate add-on at $100-$500/month based on call volume. Free trial available.
The texting math is where the comparison gets interesting. A salon sending 800 client texts a month on DaySmart can pay $40-$80 in per-message overages. On Teddy, that same volume is included. Over a year, that's $480-$960 in difference — often more than the price gap between the platforms.
Both platforms have full-featured calendars with drag-and-drop rescheduling, recurring appointments, and color coding. DaySmart's calendar feels more traditional — it shows more information per screen and is favored by veterans who've used it for years. Teddy's calendar is cleaner and more visual, better suited for groomers who use a mobile device alongside a desktop.
Teddy uses request-based online booking — clients submit a request, you approve or reschedule. This is intentional: it keeps groomers in control of which dogs and which clients fill which slots.
DaySmart offers direct calendar booking with rule-based controls. More configurable, but the trade-off is more setup time to get the rules right.
Teddy includes unlimited two-way SMS as a core feature. Threaded conversations live in each client profile, accessible from any device.
DaySmart includes texting with monthly limits depending on plan. Two-way is supported, but heavy texters pay overages or upgrade plans.
For a typical 3-station salon doing 25 appointments a day, with 3-4 texts per appointment (booking confirm, reminder, finish-time, follow-up), that's 1,800-2,400 texts a month. On Teddy, included. On DaySmart, often a meaningful overage.
Both platforms include CRM-style client profiles with pet info, service history, notes, photo uploads, and vaccination tracking. DaySmart's records are slightly more configurable for chains with custom field requirements. Teddy's records are simpler but cover everything an independent salon actually uses.
Both support digital intake forms and signed service agreements. Teddy's forms are mobile-first — clients sign on their phones in the parking lot before walking in. DaySmart supports the same workflow with slightly more form-building flexibility.
DaySmart wins on reporting depth. Sales by service, by staff, by client, retention curves, commission breakdowns, payroll integration — all built in. For multi-staff salons or chains, this matters.
Teddy's reporting covers the essentials: revenue by period, services performed, top clients, rebooking rates. For a 1-3 person operation, this is plenty. For 5+ staff, DaySmart's depth becomes more relevant.
Teddy offers an AI receptionist add-on that answers missed calls, collects pet and owner info from the caller, and follows up via text. This is genuinely useful for solo groomers who can't pick up the phone mid-groom.
DaySmart does not offer an equivalent AI receptionist as of this writing.
Teddy ships with a polished mobile app for groomers and a separate flow for clients. Most day-to-day operations can be handled on the phone.
DaySmart's mobile app exists but is less actively developed than the desktop product. Mobile-heavy users tend to prefer Teddy.
DaySmart includes its own payment processing through DaySmart Pay, plus integrations with major processors. Built-in card-on-file and split payments are mature.
Teddy integrates natively with Square. If you're already a Square salon, this is seamless. If you're not, Square is easy to set up.
DaySmart's interface reflects its age. It's powerful and stable, but visually dated, with more menus and screens than newer competitors. Veterans love it; new users sometimes describe the first week as overwhelming.
Teddy's interface is mobile-first and modern. Most new users are running real appointments within a day or two. Less to learn, but also less depth to discover later.
Both companies offer multi-channel support. DaySmart has a larger support team with phone, chat, and email coverage. Teddy support is smaller but tends to respond faster and is more flexible on feature requests.
Independent groomers and small teams who text clients heavily, value a modern mobile-first interface, want unlimited two-way SMS without overages, and could use an AI receptionist to catch missed calls. If you're already on Square, Teddy's integration is seamless.
If you've been on DaySmart for 10 years and you're tired of the interface and the per-message text fees, Teddy is the most common migration path independent groomers take.
Multi-location chains, salons with 5+ staff that need granular reporting, businesses with complex payroll and inventory needs, or anyone deeply embedded in DaySmart's ecosystem who values stability over modernization. DaySmart is enterprise-grade, and if you need that, it shows.
Before deciding, glance at MoeGo and Gingr. MoeGo is the most direct alternative to both Teddy and DaySmart, with strong mobile route optimization and deep reporting. Gingr is the right pick if you also do boarding or daycare. GrooMore is a budget option for very small operations.
The base price can be lower on DaySmart's entry tier, but unlimited texting on Teddy often closes or reverses the gap once you factor in per-message overages. Run your monthly text volume through each calculator to compare apples to apples.
Yes. Teddy's onboarding team can help import client and pet data including service history. Most salons migrate over a single weekend with no disruption to upcoming appointments.
Not in its standard plans. Texting is bundled in limited amounts based on tier, with per-message overages above that. Teddy's unlimited two-way SMS is the most-cited reason groomers switch.
Different philosophies. Teddy's request-based booking puts you in control of every appointment. DaySmart's direct booking is more configurable with rule-based logic. Pick based on whether you want to approve every booking or set rules and let the system run.
Teddy is built for 1-5 person independents and small salons. Multi-location chains are better served by DaySmart's enterprise tools or MoeGo's mid-size reporting. Some smaller 2-location operations run Teddy successfully, but it's not the platform's primary focus.
You shouldn't. Running two systems splits your data, doubles your monthly cost, and creates client confusion. Pick one and commit.
DaySmart has a larger support team with phone, chat, and email. Teddy's support is smaller but typically faster and more responsive to feature requests. Both get good marks from active users.